State Senator Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh, District 23 | Official U.S. Senate headshot
State Senator Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh, District 23 | Official U.S. Senate headshot
State Senator Rosilicie Ochoa Bogh and State Assemblymember Greg Wallis have requested that the California Air Resources Board (CARB) delay a vote on proposed changes to its Low-Carbon Fuel Standard program. The legislators, along with 23 other Republican lawmakers, sent a letter to CARB Chair Liane Randolph urging transparency regarding the costs and benefits of the proposed changes.
The vote is scheduled for November 7-8, but concerns have been raised about the potential impact on fuel prices. According to Ochoa Bogh and Wallis, Californians already pay $1.50 more per gallon than the national average in other continental states. They warn that the proposed changes could increase prices by an additional 65 to 85 cents per gallon next year, potentially reaching $1.50 by 2035.
“Families are already struggling with high gas prices, and they shouldn't be left in the dark about the financial impact of new policies,” said Senator Ochoa Bogh. “Californians deserve transparency and the chance to voice their concerns."
CARB initially estimated a 47-cent increase per gallon for public comment but withdrew this figure after criticism. Despite promises to provide updated estimates before implementing changes, CARB has stated it will not release further projections. The only available estimate comes from Dr. Danny Cullenward of Stanford University, predicting an increase of 65 to 85 cents per gallon.
“The state’s refusal to disclose the real cost of these changes is irresponsible,” said Assemblymember Wallis.
Ochoa Bogh, Wallis, and fellow Republicans argue that policy-making authority should be reclaimed from unelected boards like CARB, which are not directly accountable to voters.
CARB's board comprises political appointees selected by Governor Newsom and Democratic leaders in the Senate Rules Committee and State Assembly Speaker.
Former Democrat Assemblymember Jim Cooper criticized CARB's leadership for advancing policies perceived as benefiting coastal elites over broader interests.